|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 20:18:04 GMT -5
---- long time. how've you been, still whoring?
closed.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 20:38:21 GMT -5
 not any more than you have,
which could be from anything from a lot
to mass amounts.
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 20:41:39 GMT -5
---- and that's where your wrong. i'm with bailey again. she's pregnant, actually - due in probably just a few days now.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 20:45:39 GMT -5
well, isn't that.. charming.
i think. i don't know.
i don't know if i should congratulate you or not, actually.
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 20:47:21 GMT -5
---- im not bothered either way! but i think you're clearly just jealous.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 20:49:38 GMT -5
jealous, that's cute.
you would like to think so, wouldn't you?
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 20:50:35 GMT -5
---- lolol, yeah cute. not jealous of me, of bailey, i mean.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 20:52:03 GMT -5
really though, why would i be jealous?
strange insult considering the circumstances, lol
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 20:56:35 GMT -5
---- im simply stating that you wish you could have my babies.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 21:00:48 GMT -5
you wish i wished i could have your babies~
as for right now, i think any children i might have would do
a lot better without your genes.
|
|
|
|
Post by sylvia marie van dijk. on May 28, 2009 21:08:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 21:12:56 GMT -5
the assumption that i want to have
any sort of intimate relationship with you
wasn't so thoughtful either, buddy~
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 21:21:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolette on May 28, 2009 21:22:23 GMT -5
oh?
and why is that, exactly?
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan james valmont. on May 28, 2009 21:24:00 GMT -5
---- no reason, i just do! don't question it.
|
|
